Abraham Lee <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, Chad! > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:19 AM Chad Linsley <cli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’m by no means a seasoned Lilypond pro but I’ve been exploring how the >> program handles beams. In the essay, the 1950 Barenreiter Bach cello suite >> edition is held up as a benchmark of high quality engraving. Seeing this >> really helps the user understand why Lilypond’s default slurs are shaped >> the way they are (not overly curvaceous). However, when I entered the first >> few systems, the beaming was much steeper than in the Barenreiter. It only >> started looking closer to it when I put a blank measure on the end (three >> measures to system = tighter spacing). I then tried the various tweaking >> parameters for beams which worked fine on a beam-to-beam basis. What I’m >> curious about is whether or not Lilypond can be set to produce beaming >> closer to the Barenreiter without quite as much intervention. For example, >> the damping factor didn’t respond very sensitively when I tried using >> decimal points. >> >> Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks! >> > > Here's my first page of this piece.
I'd have been interested in the second one, the multi-string passages close to the end. Since there are fingerings in your page, you are obviously not writing an Urtext. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
