Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > Which may still entail different metronome markings for different > groups or performers simultaneously, as in the example I gave, or for > example in Britten’s War Requiem. True, it would require the user to > really specify the metronome markings only in the top staff of the > respective group (or remove the engraver from the other staves) – > that’s a drawback, if not a huge one IMO. > Now if we created a new TimingGroup context which contains StaffGroup > and Staff level contexts, doesn’t alter barlines &c. and \consists > only of Metronome_mark_engraver – but I shouldn’t snowball on with > major new inventions like that, I guess? It _would_ suit the semantics > very well and be satisfyingly clear to document.
I don't see any semantics it would suit. What would it be useful for? I mean, you can easily define such a context and play around with it in a document of yours, but I doubt it would do what you expect it to do. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
