Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > On 21.07.2018 09:08, David Kastrup wrote: >>> It’s also sensible as well as intuitive and mnemonic to address the >>> Timing alias here: >>> >>> \set Timing.tempoHideNote = ##t >> Only if you move the Metronome_mark_engraver in polyrhythmic situations. >> If you don't and Timing is at Staff level... The Midi is also affected >> at Score level. > > This got me thinking – the only reason not to move > Metronome_mark_engraver is laziness or forgetting to do so.
I don't think so. Polyrhythm does not mean the loss of a common timing, and LilyPond does not implement it in that manner. It means that the metric division of the passing time is different in different instrument groups. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
