Am 11.02.2018 um 11:19 schrieb Gregrs:
Hi Simon,
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:01:52PM +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Looks nice, thanks for sharing!
Did you consider using Urs’ lilyglyphs package for the dynamics? Of
course that would require compiling with xelatex or lualatex…
Thanks. I wanted to use plain LaTeX but using the lilyglyphs package
would certainly be a nice option for the dynamics, and not having to
consider what the bold italic variant of a font looks like for the
dynamics would allow a greater range of fonts for the text.
I've just experimented with this, and for anyone wanting to try this
out, you'd need to do the following:
In psalm.ltx add \usepackage{fontspec} and \usepackage{lilyglyphs},
and in \includegraphics, change the resolution and scale options to
just scale=0.1164.
In psalm.sty, change the definition of \dyn to \lilyDynamics{#1}.
In Makefile, change pdflatex to xelatex.
I've added a xelatex branch to the GitHub repository with these
changes but I think I'll stick with LaTeX as the default option for now.
Reading your reply I don't think that's an option, but I wanted to throw
yet anothe tool into the mix: if LuaLaTeX would be acceptable as a
requirement it would be possible to realize that in LaTeX, using
lyluatex (https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex) to manage included
LilyPond code.
Probably it would be even possible to prepare a Pandoc template (see
https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/64) and then write the files
in Markdown.
(Please don't look at the package as included in TeXLive, that version
is essentially a first shot and the package is currently under heavy
development, with a comprehensive release to be expected soon.)
Best
Urs
Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
