Hi Simon, On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:01:52PM +0100, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Looks nice, thanks for sharing!Did you consider using Urs’ lilyglyphs package for the dynamics? Of course that would require compiling with xelatex or lualatex…
Thanks. I wanted to use plain LaTeX but using the lilyglyphs package would certainly be a nice option for the dynamics, and not having to consider what the bold italic variant of a font looks like for the dynamics would allow a greater range of fonts for the text.
I've just experimented with this, and for anyone wanting to try this out, you'd need to do the following:
In psalm.ltx add \usepackage{fontspec} and \usepackage{lilyglyphs}, and in \includegraphics, change the resolution and scale options to just scale=0.1164.
In psalm.sty, change the definition of \dyn to \lilyDynamics{#1}.
In Makefile, change pdflatex to xelatex.
I've added a xelatex branch to the GitHub repository with these changes
but I think I'll stick with LaTeX as the default option for now.
Thanks, Greg -- Twitter: @gregrs_uk PGP key ID: 64907C8A Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
