"Hugh S. Myers" <hsmy...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:43 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> Joshua Netterfield <jos...@nettek.ca> writes: >>> >>> > Hi Andrew, >>> > >>> > Absolutely, supporting other versions is on my TODO list, and I'll >>> > post back here when it's done. >>> > >>> > I used the term "unstable" because I saw the term "unstable >>> > development versions" [1] on the Lilypond website (e.g., at >>> > http://lilypond.org/development.html), not because I have had any >>> > issues with 2.19. I interpreted that (perhaps incorrectly — please >>> > correct me if I'm wrong) as meaning that things are in flux such that >>> > songs that were valid in one version might not be valid in the next >>> > version. >>> >>> Correct. >>> >>> -- >>> David Kastrup > > 'OS that is not Windows'…so you are saying to hell with 7 out of 10 users? > Well, that's one way to cut down on all that annoying customer noise! > > --hsm > p.s. I write *multi-platform* modules for *CPAN *and yes it is a great deal > of extra work but it is pretty much '*the right thing to do*'…
I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about here and why you would break out in an operating system tirade because I replied to Joshua that his idea of our use of "stable" vs "unstable" versions is correct and thus a stable version seems inherently sensible as default in connection with his web-based LilyPond editor. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
