---- On Sat, 07 Oct 2017 20:49:31 +0800 Simon Albrecht <[email protected]>
wrote ----
> On 07.10.2017 13:55, James Harkins wrote:
> > But, it's a <b b'> chord where I want the lower tie to go down, and
> > the upper one to go up...
>
> Put the ties inside the chord:
> <b_~ b'^~>
Oh... I'm afraid I spoke too soon. The syntax is accepted, but ignored in the
printed output. I still get two down-ties.
It must be conflict-resolution logic. See the comment: "I remove *either* the a
or the d from this chord, I get up/down ties."
\new Score {
\new Staff {
<<
{ \time 4/4 \partial 4 s4 | s4*2 }
\new Voice = "zeroA03" \relative c' {
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
<b b'>4 ~
<b_~ b'^~>1 <b e f a b d>1
}
\context Voice = "zeroA03" \relative c' {
s4
s2.
\hideNotes
% if I remove *either* the a or the d from this chord,
% I get up/down ties from <b b'> above
\voiceTwo \tieNeutral <e f a d>4 ~
\unHideNotes
}
% This displays the e-f-a-d notes
% that are the source of the 4 extra ties.
% Doesn't matter to <b b'> tie behavior
%\new Voice = "zeroB03" \relative c' {
% s4
% \voiceTwo \tieNeutral r4 <f a>2 ~ <e f a d>4 %~
%}
>>
}
}
hjh
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
