David, Understood. Thank you.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:52 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> Cc: 'Gianmaria Lari' <gianmarial...@gmail.com>; 'lilypond-user' <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: Re: \mark and slur "Mark Stephen Mrotek" <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> writes: > David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] wrote: >> <lilypond-user@gnu.org> >> Subject: Re: \mark and slur >> >> "Mark Stephen Mrotek" <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> writes: >> >>> Try >>> >>> c4 c c d >>> >>> (c4^\markup {"X"}) c c c >> >> Shrug. If you insist on that kind of organization you can try >> >> \version "2.19.65" >> >> \fixed c' { >> >> c4 c c d >> >> (\mark "X" c4) c c c >> >> } >> >> But it's really a delusion you are getting and becomes rather >> strained once you go, like >> >> \version "2.19.65" >> >> \fixed c' { >> > c4 c c d > > (|\mark "X" c4) c c c > > } > > What I presented was a suggestion that "worked." > In no way, shape, or form was it an "insistence." It was meant as "if _one_ insists on that kind of organization" (rather than _you_) and referred to you trying to give a version matching the original spirit which constituted the frame of reference or insistence. Basically, I saw you as trying to accommodate an assumed insistence rather than being insistant yourself. I just don't think that this manner of writing warrants accommodation: there just are too many cases where it will get strained to the point of falling apart. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
