> From: Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> > Hi, > > > warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event > > I would understand it best if the warning said any of: > > Cannot attach slur to preceding expression > Slur is not attached to note or chord > Cannot attach slur to note or chord > No note or chord before this slur to attach it to (is that English?) > No note or chord is preceeding this slur >
Regarding the English, some strict grammarians might scoff with sentences that end with prepositions. However, this is the way most people talk, so I wouldn't rule out that formulation on that basis. Here are some variations to consider that are more grammatical: Could not find a preceding note or chord to which to attach this slur Slur is not preceded by a note or chord Slur lacks a preceding note or chord to which to attach HTH, David Elaine Alt 415 . 341 .4954 "*Confusion is highly underrated*" ela...@flaminghakama.com self-immolation.info skype: flaming_hakama Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
