On 29/05/17 06:04, Carl Sorensen wrote: > Charles's project is not to solve all three of these. In fact, his > project is not to completely solve any one of them. Rather, his problem > is to determine how best to save the semantics, so that assuming the > semantics are properly entered in chordmode (probably including some > extensions to the current chordmode, or maybe even a start from scratch > rewrite, but that's out of scope for this project), the semantics will be > kept as part of the chord, and thus be available for the > chord_name_engraver to use when generating a chord name.
Just thinking out loud, but there's a fairly standard format for figured bass, isn't there? If we've got chordmode and notemode, it wouldn't be hard to add figuredbassmode, would it? That actually gives you quite a lot of semantic information I think :-) And it sets a bit of a precedent for "if you want a weird chord format, define your own input/output mode" :-) Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
