> On 10 Feb 2017, at 00:35, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: > >>> On 10 Feb 2017, at 00:16, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> So is there any reason people don't use convert-ly when upgrading to >>> a newer version? >> >> For libraries, you would want to keep track of the changes, but >> running convert-ly and do a diff is a good suggestion. > > convert-ly -d inserts an updated \version header.
You wouldn't want to do that with library headers, in case something goes wrong. Better to create a separate file, and check file dates, as in a Makefile. >> Though doing it by hand was quicker, as I remembered the issue and >> which files needed to be fixed. > > How does _this_ "keep track of the changes"? Maybe you consider your > biological memory part of the data on your computer? I cannot parse this. > It's a common fallacy of young programmers that may take a few decades > to cure. Nor this. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
