Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:53, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >> >>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:44, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >>>> >>>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:24, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:10, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 22:47, Cole Ingraham <coledingra...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've used Sagittal notation based on http://x31eq.com/lilypond/ >>>>>>>>>> before. I don't know if that still works with more recent versions >>>>>>>>>> though. Haven't touched it in a while. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I get an error in LilyPond 2.19.45, with an unbound variable "parser": >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here >>>>>>>>> # (ly:parser-set-note-names parser EqualFiftythreePitchNames) >>>>>>>>> Unbound variable: parser >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any reason people don't use convert-ly when upgrading to a >>>>>>>> newer version? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe because it is in some library files. >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn't even make sense. >>>>> >>>>> The code makes use of three different external libraries. >>>> >>>> So? Why wouldn't you upgrade the libraries when upgrading LilyPond? >>> >>> Those are not my libraries. I updated some, that is hacked them to >>> work, but that was a year ago. >> >> And that means that you are not allowed to run convert-ly on them but >> have to edit them by hand instead? >> >> I'll stick with my "that doesn't even make sense" verdict, thank you >> very much. > > Why don't you do it? I have posted the code. So all you have to do is > to hack it back, as indicated above,
The code you uploaded is already fixed. Taking regular.ly from x31eq.com and running convert-ly -ed -f 2.18.0 on it fixes the syntax. > and then run convert-ly on them to see if it works. It does. So is there any reason people don't use convert-ly when upgrading to a newer version? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
