Hi David, I know. It is the unreasonable bashing of floating point inaccuracies comment that I was referring to, rather than what lilypond actually does.
On 8 November 2016 at 22:23, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Since LilyPond does not use floating point numbers for durations, all > this is a bit beside the point. > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
