2016-10-22 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2016-10-22 10:12 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> The first hit reads in sourcefiles/guile.changelog: >>>> >>>> guile (1.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low >>>> >>>> * Add readline as build dependency, libreadline8 as dependency for >>>> libguile17 (thanks Ted Anderson). >>>> * Remove /etc/hints. >>>> * Remove curr from hints. >>>> >>>> -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:47:35 +0100 >>>> >>>> No idea whether it's important, it's far beyond my depth. >>> >>> That would point to readline support being compiled in. libreadline8 >>> would likely be the current one. >>> >>> At any rate, David stated that calling the lilypond executable with full >>> path left him with working readline support. >>> >>> Does >>> >>> which lilypond >>> >>> agree that the version called without explicit path is the same as with >>> path? If so, something in command line processing would appear to make >>> use of the 0th argument for finding libraries. That would warrant more >>> examination. >>> >>> -- >>> David Kastrup >> >> which lilypond >> returns in my case: >> /home/hermann/bin/lilypond >> which is the script for 2.18.2 I mentioned in my previous post. > > David stated: > > I find the following: > > 1) > > If I run 'lilypond scheme-sandbox' I get a message saying: > > /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/scheme- > sandbox.ly:3:2: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression > beginning here > # > (load-user-init) > readline is not provided in this Guile installation > > In 'top' I can see that the actual running command is > '/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond scheme-sandbox'. > > 2) > > If I run '/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond scheme-sandbox' directly > from the command line, I get guile complete with readline. > > > which sounds like he is _not_ running the wrapper script when stuff > works but rather the executable without the wrapper. So it would appear > that what the wrapper does happens to interfere with finding the system > readline library while LilyPond presumably does not provide one of its > own. Who is the main author of that wrapper? Maybe he has an idea? > > -- > David Kastrup
The entire (unchanged) wrapper script reads: #!/bin/sh me=`basename $0` export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/hermann/lilypond/usr/lib" exec "/home/hermann/lilypond/usr/bin/$me" "$@" Commenting the line "export ..." works, though I can't imagine the consequences. No idea who wrote the script, though. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
