Am 21.10.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Sirius Barras:
> > What is the partial solution you found so far (would be very helpful to
> > know)?
>
> Difficult to answer, found many things:)
>
> When I have not been able to solve my problem with what I thought it
> was the correct (but ugly)...
>
> \mark \markup \column {"1.\dynamic p" "2.\dynamic f"}
> bes'2.-3 bes'4-4
>
> I tried everything I found online, mixing \mark \markup \tweak etc. I
> know it's not the best way to work but sometimes you hope in miracles :)
>
> > The following seems to *basically* do what you need:
> > <<
> > \new Staff { c'1 }
> > \new Dynamics { s1 \p }
> > \new Dynamics { s1 \f }
> > \new Staff { \clef bass c1 }
> > >>
>
> Yes, you're right, it doesn't look good yet :)
;-)
No need to bother with that before knowing it's the right direction.
> but it is probably what I need. I have some more question.
>
> 1) I separated left and right hand using two variables. To generate
> the output I do:
>
> \score
> {
> \new PianoStaff
> <<
> \new Staff = "right" {\right}
> \new Staff = "left" { \left}
> >>
> \layout { }
> }
>
> Then, even if possible it would be extremely difficult to use your
> solution....isn't it? Should I arrange the code differently?
Not at all. If you specify the dynamics as two more variables (e.g.
dynOne and dynTwo) you can simply write
\new Staff = "right" {\right}
\new Dynamics \dynOne
\new Dynamics \dynTwo
\new Staff = "left" { \left}
(with all the surroundings of course)
(BTW: if you assign *only* the variable to the staff you don't need the
curly braces around it)
> And also is there a better way to indicate that the first repeat you
> have to play "piano" and the second time "forte"?
I think your solution is pretty straightforward and common.
Best
Urs
>
> Thank you very much Urs.
> S.
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
