Maxwell Phillips <m.phillips...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks everyone for all the great info! Both the examples and the > explanation of how these properties work are really helpful. > > It seems like including an argument in the engraver definition is the way > to go, unless you need to manually change the behavior in the middle of a > score. But maybe in many situations this isn't a bad test of how well > thought-out the engraver is.
Most engravers really are better off with maintaining their own variables: those can work with multiple engraver instances and cannot get lost when using \change . Context properties are nice for communication. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
