2015-12-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Though, I thought about some sort of macro, doing the job like: >> >> %% the macro: >> \simple-define-markup-command >> %% the args: >> % name: >> bold-red >> % body: >> \bold \with-color #red \etc >> >> I think it would prevent some confusions. > > \etc is not a "body". It's a "the last markup command is incomplete, > defer to its signature for the types of the missing arguments" marker. > And you have nothing in your "macro" that would actually switch the > "body" into markup mode. To me, that looks like being harder to explain > to both compiler and user.
Harder to the compiler? Yes, not hard to imagine. To the user? I'm not sure. But that's only me. This is the user-list, though, other users could step in as well... Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
