Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > Not sure why > foo-markup = \markup \bold \with-color #cyan \markletter \etc > \markup \foo #1 > does not work, as opposed to > bold-red-markup = \markup \bold \with-color #red \etc > \markup \bold-red "text"
Anyway, should this rather work using the syntax \markup bold-red = \bold \with-color #red \etc ? this would have the advantage of hiding the way \markup introduces its own name space, and one could use the full define-markup-command resulting in (markup #:bold-red ...) and make-bold-red-markup working as well. But it seems weird to use this for \etc-style functions only. And the whole markup-macro machinery is crazy anyway. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
