Trevor Bača <trevorb...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited > about what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs mean > that a single voice will (eventually) be able to carry multiple *text > spanners*???
Well, that was the motivation for renaming the originally proposed "slur-id" to "spanner-id" before it made it through code review. There is no code backing this so far except for slurs and phrasing slurs, but it's pretty clear that when such code appears, there would be no point in inventing a different interface for it. I've been starting some sketches for a C++ class solution encapsulating the multiple-spanner part (so that text spanners and likely some other ones can share the spanner-id implementation of slurs) but so far have not actually invested enough work to call this "sketches" rather than "doodles". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
