Hi,
I'm coming late to this discussion, but potentially *very* excited about
what this might mean. Will the available of spanner IDs mean that a single
voice will (eventually) be able to carry multiple *text spanners*???
This would be incredibly useful in my own scores (and probably also in the
scores of very many other composers who work with simultaneous continuous
transitions). I've attached a PNG of an example from a recent cello piece.
The score is in LilyPond, but the engraving required multiple (redundant)
invisible markup voices. Would be so elegant to be need only a single voice.
Trevor.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:43 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > (4)
> > Observation:
> > Using Slurs with and without setted 'spanner-id works as well
> > \relative { c'\=1( d( e\=1) f) }
> >
> > \relative { c'\=1(^( e\=1)) }
>
> The default is a spanner-id of "" so that's not much of a surprise.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
--
Trevor Bača
www.trevorbaca.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
