It might be helpful to have lilyjazz examples old/new side by side with
explicite evidence to the unbeautiful elements?
I just got the "new" version happily to work. I cannot make such
examples as I do not have the old/new version working simultaneosly. I
fear my lilypond skills are not sufficiant to handle both versions side
by side.
Regards
Am 23.08.2015 23:42, schrieb tisimst:
Tim,
Would you mind expounding a little further on what you feel has
degraded since the original was published? I will tell you what I've
done, but I would appreciate hearing your thoughts, especially if
many others feel similarly.
In bringing the original LilyJAZZ font up to speed, I don't
recall editing ANY of the original glyphs in the font. I did _add_
some to make it more complete, but that's it.
The other thing that might be causing visual is the stylesheet I've
created to go along with the font family. If that's the problem,
please help me out by offering some suggestions. I've created
settings that I thought were reasonable and compliment the font, but
that doesn't mean they have to stay that way. I guess the nice thing
is that you can adapt it to whatever styles _you_ like.
Please help me know, if you would. Thanks!!
- Abraham
On Sunday, August 23, 2015, Tim McNamara [via Lilypond] <[hidden
email] [7]> wrote:
On Aug 23, 2015, at 1:37 PM, Tim McNamara <[hidden email] [1]>
wrote:
On Aug 23, 2015, at 6:56 AM, BB <[hidden email] [2]> wrote:
<snip>
Does anybody sucessful use LilyJAZZ?
Yes, I have been using it for over a year with excellent results,
although there are some quirks. For example, it kills bar
numbering. It also interferes with improvisationOn and I have to
turn off LilyJazz to be able to use that. Also, looking at the web
page that was referenced in other threads, it appears that the old
LilyJAZZ font has been completely replaced (looking at the example
lead sheet). To my eyes the old font was much better and I won’t
be updating to the new version. The new version looks awkward and
doesn’t visually flow very well. YMMV.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email] [3]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user [4]
-------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion below:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180026.html
[5]
To start a new topic under User, email <a
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ml-node%2bs1069038n...@n5.nabble.com');"
target="_blank">ml-node+s1069038n3h2@...
To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
NAML [6]
-------------------------
View this message in context: Re: LilyJAZZ [8]
Sent from the User mailing list archive [9] at Nabble.com.
Links:
------
[1] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180026&i=0
[2] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180026&i=1
[3] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180026&i=2
[4] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[5] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180026.html
[6]
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
[7]
http://webmailer.telecolumbus.net/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180036&i=0
[8] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180036.html
[9] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
