tisimst <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > On 8/21/2015 5:40 AM, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] wrote: >> ... >> I am sorry this is not the technical answer you require, but part of >> your answer is that lilypond can't irregularise (I am going to make >> this a new word) scores, out of the box, as it stands now. > > Andrew and Sharon, et al, > > To say that it can't do this "out of the box" is definitely true. To say > that it just plain "can't" is definitely NOT true. I created a > stylesheet that applied the irregularization (ha! I created a new word > based on yours!) to just about everything--clefs, noteheads, stems, > flags, slurs, etc--to give it that human-touched feel. It worked pretty > well. There was one oddity I encountered in the process, though. When I > irregularized the flags, I noticed that a flag is printed for EVERY note > within the same chord! Crazy, I know. Sounds like an unnecessary thing > if you ask me.
Sounds like an undiscovered bug if you ask me. > that is where you see the glyph multiplicity. Under "normal" usage, > this isn't a problem. But still, it seems like something that isn't > needed. If nothing else, it is costly. And it messes up antialiasing in PDF previewers if you overprint material repeatedly (it gets fatter). And likely increases PDF size. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
