PS- obviously, that's a typo in the first paragraph of my last message: it
should read "16th note with a secondary BEAM" (not stem). Anyway, here
attached is a (really terrible freehand GIMP-made) drawing of what I want
to see.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:12 PM, N. Andrew Walsh <n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi David/Andrew/'ponders,
>
> actually, what I want is two things: that the stem extends downward from
> the beam, and that this stemlet is connected to the following 16th note
> with a secondary stem. As it is now, the secondary beam stops midway
> between the c16 and the r16.
>
> In short, what I want to see is that the beams look exacty the same
> whether it's a note or a rest under them. Setting stem length with the
> \verride fixes the first part, but does it also achieve the latter?
>
> Cheers,
>
> A
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:57 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> "N. Andrew Walsh" <n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > So, I have the following:
>>
>> > { c2~ c4 c8[ r16 c16] | c4 }
>> >
>> > in Lily, the r16 does not get a stem, nor a second beam, which looks …
>> > muddled. How do I change this behavior?
>>
>> \override Stem.stemlet-length = #0.5
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
