Hi Thomas, > the cleanest way would be to redefine the chordNameFunction, currently > it's 'ignatzek-chord-names' > A lot of work though... > > That said, I've tried the engraver-route. > Though, I've absolutely no clue about the nashville-system, thus have > a thorough look at the output:
Harmonically, this appears to be it. However the Nashville Number System also has rhythmic markings (for chord changes on odd beats of the measure, for bars with a different count than the rest, for breaks both long and short…) that still would have to be introduced in order to make it a standard-conforming Nashville System chart – the system is quite rigorously defined. In essence, we'd need to be able to underline chord symbols, to surround them with square and diamond-shaped boxes, and to decorate them with tick marks (´) and two kinds of accents (^ and >). For key changes, there'd need to be a relative modulation mark (such as "Mod +1/2"). Thanks for all your work, Amy -- Dr. Amelie Zapf (a...@ameliezapf.com) Pianist, Bassist, Guitarist, Composer, Friedrich-Ebert-Str. 25, 14548 Caputh, Germany http://www.ameliezapf.com/ PGP public key ID: 4E0A7F00 "When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." - Jimi Hendrix _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
