I see. Nice score, and it’s definitely an element of style that it’s done this way. On p.5, 2nd system, it might also improve legibility, I think – but then the following staff is deliberately difficult to read again, as Satie sometimes made it.
So it’s unfortunate that Lily doesn’t provide an elegant :-) solution.

Good night, Simon

Am 15.06.2015 um 23:43 schrieb Knute Snortum:
Here is the PDF I got the Satie piece from

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_aEseOV9KTXbmdiU0ROU01aeDQ/view?usp=sharing

First movement, right at the beginning of the piece and all through it.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:43 PM Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de <mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de>> wrote:

    Am 15.06.2015 um 20:45 schrieb Knute Snortum:
    > Thanks for your reply.  This score is from 1916 so maybe it didn't
    > adhere to the standard or maybe it wasn't well established then.
    Oh, this kind of standards are definitely older than 1916. Would you
    mind sending an example (or link)? I imagine that also in very good
    engravings it might have been done differently for special reasons.

    Yours, Simon

--
--
Knute Snortum
(sent from Gmail)

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to