I see. Nice score, and it’s definitely an element of style that it’s
done this way. On p.5, 2nd system, it might also improve legibility, I
think – but then the following staff is deliberately difficult to read
again, as Satie sometimes made it.
So it’s unfortunate that Lily doesn’t provide an elegant :-) solution.
Good night, Simon
Am 15.06.2015 um 23:43 schrieb Knute Snortum:
Here is the PDF I got the Satie piece from
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_aEseOV9KTXbmdiU0ROU01aeDQ/view?usp=sharing
First movement, right at the beginning of the piece and all through it.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:43 PM Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de
<mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de>> wrote:
Am 15.06.2015 um 20:45 schrieb Knute Snortum:
> Thanks for your reply. This score is from 1916 so maybe it didn't
> adhere to the standard or maybe it wasn't well established then.
Oh, this kind of standards are definitely older than 1916. Would you
mind sending an example (or link)? I imagine that also in very good
engravings it might have been done differently for special reasons.
Yours, Simon
--
--
Knute Snortum
(sent from Gmail)
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
