On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:45:20PM +0200, Gilles wrote: > If and when "big" publishers use LilyPond, the result will be more > restricted access (through cost) to culture (because they won't release > their proprietary contents).
Forgive me if I've missed important bits of this conversation, but I'm not I understand your point here -- can you expand on this statement? Why do you feel that large-scale adoption of OSS (in general) will restrict and increase the cost of cultural access? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
