> Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:28:35 +0100 > From: "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> > To: "Phil Holmes" <philehol...@googlemail.com>, "LilyPond User Group" > <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: Re: Windows performance > Message-ID: > <assp.154812a152.24D5F6F494F544389C536A4DA2947FBB@TrevorLaptop> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM > > >> The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than >> previous versions. Some examples: >> >> A 26 page multi-score piece I've been working on: >> 2.19.16: 114s to compile >> 2.19.18: 52s > ... [etc] > > That's remarkable. I can see no change between 2.19.16 > and 2.19.18 that might account for this enormous change. > The only effect of this magnitude which I've seen in the > past is to do with setting up the font library when LP > is run for the first time. But that would be an increase. > > Any chance your 2.19.18 is using a different hard disk, > an SSD maybe, which the others weren't?
I just repeated Phil’s 3-line stress test on a Mac Pro (2.66 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 16 GB RAM) with the following versions of LP and compile times: > > LP v2.19.18: 13.0s > LP v2.19.15: 24.4s > LP v2.18.2: 24.2s I’d say a significant difference from 2.19.15 to 2.19.18. Regards, Pat Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
