Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM
> The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than > previous versions. Some examples: > > A 26 page multi-score piece I've been working on: > 2.19.16: 114s to compile > 2.19.18: 52s ... [etc] That's remarkable. I can see no change between 2.19.16 and 2.19.18 that might account for this enormous change. The only effect of this magnitude which I've seen in the past is to do with setting up the font library when LP is run for the first time. But that would be an increase. Any chance your 2.19.18 is using a different hard disk, an SSD maybe, which the others weren't? Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
