[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:30:57 -0400 > Kieren Richard MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any way to see if Feta meets the same specifications? I have > > found no way to get those specs from the web... > > 1) Do we particularily care about such awards? IMO LilyPond's quality > speaks for itself. > > If you can find out more info, and if it wouldn't cost anything, it > might be worth submitting feta. But as it stands, I don't think > it's worth spending much time and effort looking into it.
It would be cool if LilyPond's quality were recognized officially. We talked with a couple of engravers and a publisher, who acknowledge that LilyPond's quality (well, some parts of it) speaks for itself, but it would be a nice to get some official seal of approval to put on the "quotes" web page. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
