[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > It really wouldn't be that difficult to make a setting to > > > > it depends. It would be quite hairy to get transposition right, for > > example. > > Not if the operation of making the signature chromatics is done *first*. > [..snippage..] > > I'm sure I could implement this to use with sly, but sly is really > for large projects, and MakeKeySignatureChromatics would probably > be of even more use to someone doing something small in a hurry.
I suppose that it would have to be added to sly, because I'm not adding it to LilyPond: I think it is a bad idea. Discussion closed. > > > Is there some reason "x" can't be used optionally instead of > > > "ss"? It wouldn't be necessary to get rid of "ss" to do it. > > > daveA > > > > ss? > > > > You mean sharpsharp for the US-notenames? > > Sure. I have never seen a double sharp referred to as a sharpsharp. > Is "gx" much worse than "gisis", if you could use both > indiscriminately added to 1.9 CVS. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
