I've attached the dvipslist and xdvilist. They appear to have different lists of fonts in them. I also printed the dvips generated file and it looks just like it does in gv (completely messed up).
Russell. On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 02:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Try the following: > > export KPATHSEA_DEBUG=32 > dvips yourfile.dvi 2>&1 | grep '=>' | grep feta > dvipslist > xdvi yourfile.dvi 2>&1 | grep '=>' | grep feta > xdvilist > > This will give you two log files with paths to the font files > that dvips and xdvi use. Normally, the same fonts should be > used by both dvips and xdvi. > > By the way, have you tried to print the PS file generated by > dvips. Some month ago, one guy on the list experienced font > problems when viewing the PS file in gv/ghostview/... but > they printed nicely on paper and when he sent an example file, > it looked completely normal here. > > /Mats > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lilypond-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > -- Russell Smiley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) => kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.720pk) => ./feta-nummer8.720pk kdebug:search(feta16.vf) => kdebug:search(feta16.720pk) => ./feta16.720pk kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) => kdebug:search(feta-braces4.720pk) => ./feta-braces4.720pk
kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) => kdebug:search(feta-braces4.300pk) => /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-braces4.300pk kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) => kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.300pk) => /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-nummer8.300pk kdebug:search(feta16.vf) => kdebug:search(feta16.300pk) => /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta16.300pk
