You're correct. I just did a clean font. I viewed my example with xdvi and tried "kpsewhich feta20.pk" again. No response again.
However I did notice that there is no font problem with xdvi (and the rests are okay, they have also been a problem)...see the attached png. > xdvi -v xdvi version 22.05d-k It seems the problem is the conversion from dvi to postscript. Perhaps I am not using the correct tools to convert to postscript? If I use dvips to convert to ps I get the attached png (badfont_dvips.png). A real mess. > dvips -v This is dvips(k) 5.86 Copyright 1999 Radical Eye Software My example with just the rests and numbers broken in the previous email used "ly2dvi -P -s papersize="letter" $^". Which tool should I be using? Evidently both ly2dvi and dvips are broken somehow (or I'm not using them correctly). Thanks for your help. Russell. On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 07:12, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > kpsewhich feta20.pk > > [no response] > > So, you just did a clean-font, right? > Try to process your example file again and view it with > xdvi or dvips+ghostview and then try 'kpsewhich feta20.pk' > again. > -- Russell Smiley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<attachment: okayfont_dvi.png>>
<<attachment: badfont_dvips.png>>
