jos wrote:
>
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> >
> > Nice thought. \Seq1? (down by default) \Seq5up? What about
> > accidentals?
> >
> > I would guess that macros within xemacs would actually save more typing
> > than
> > commands in lilypond when what you are doing is composition shortcuts.
> > I don't know whether or not there is any interest or movement in that
> > direction. I floated that as a way of making tab more versatile while
> > keeping it easy to type, but nothing has happened.
>
> HI!
>
> In a sequence there are (per definition) no accidentals.
Of course there can be chromatics in a sequence that is not chromatic,
as long as it is not entirely chromatic. c b c
as c a c g f e d c....b as b a b g b f e d c b... See Villa Lobos
Prelude 3 for guitar. It is not even uncommon. perhaps the definition
lacks
precision, like defining the time value of a note as its duration. ;-)
Unfortunately, this sort of thing makes writing a macro somewhat more
difficult, but it is also why it is such a better idea to do it as a
macro rather than to scramble the syntax with it.
>
> And yes, I also made some vim macro's to do that, some time ago.
> But I misplaced them unfortunately and have to program them
> again. Well, maybe that is the best idea anyway...
>
> best regards,
>
> jos
I'm sure the original poster would appreciate it. I think this was on
-user, so I hope you don't mind. You don't like xemacs? I
thought emacs was the "official" editor. Thanks in any case. :-)
------------------------------------------------------------
Information is not knowledge. Belief is not
truth. --Anon David Raleigh Arnold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
