On 2026-02-21 12:16, Mats Bengtsson via Discussions on LilyPond
development wrote:
I cannot contribute with any suitable test cases, but with a question.
Is there any specific reason that the ly code isn't shown in the
example "The \time command now accepts a rational number in the
numerator. ...", in contrast to all the other examples?
The guidance for that document is to keep examples short, the code for
that sample is relatively long, and the syntax is basically the same as
for the rational number in the denominator.
It might make more sense to show the denominator example first; do you
think that would have kept you from asking the question?
--
Dan
