Ok awesome On Sat, 27 Jul 2024, 21:35 Werner LEMBERG, <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > Yes, I might be a moment due to friends visiting and such, but > > definitely can. > > Great! > > > Could you get me going pointing me to a few image pairs and an > > indication (like you did on SE) of the defect you see? > > The example I gave on SE is *the* example – a small object of about > the size of a note head that appears, disappears, or is slightly moved > while the rest of the image stays the same. > > > Python/NumPy/SciPy ok, yes? > > For a demo, yes, of course. > > > I'll pick a random version to show the concept, and then we can > > adapt to whatever dependencies lily is comfortable with. > > Importantly: is it ok to make lilypond's test suite depend on NumPy? > > It's not a small package (although it is easy and rock-solid to > > install) > > Let's see what you come up with – and thanks in advance! Python is ok > since the testing script (`output-distance.py`) is written in Python, > too. As you say, a dependency on NumPy shouldn't be too much of a > problem, but Jonas can evaluate this better than me. > > > Werner >