> Yes, I might be a moment due to friends visiting and such, but
> definitely can.
Great!
> Could you get me going pointing me to a few image pairs and an
> indication (like you did on SE) of the defect you see?
The example I gave on SE is *the* example – a small object of about
the size of a note head that appears, disappears, or is slightly moved
while the rest of the image stays the same.
> Python/NumPy/SciPy ok, yes?
For a demo, yes, of course.
> I'll pick a random version to show the concept, and then we can
> adapt to whatever dependencies lily is comfortable with.
> Importantly: is it ok to make lilypond's test suite depend on NumPy?
> It's not a small package (although it is easy and rock-solid to
> install)
Let's see what you come up with – and thanks in advance! Python is ok
since the testing script (`output-distance.py`) is written in Python,
too. As you say, a dependency on NumPy shouldn't be too much of a
problem, but Jonas can evaluate this better than me.
Werner
