On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 14:24 -0500, Karlin High wrote:
> On 3/23/2024 2:00 PM, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Would be interesting to see how this compares to the "vanilla" package
> 
> I tried it, 3 runs. First one maybe unfair because font cache 
> initialization or something.
> 
> real    0m48.643s
> user    0m0.000s
> sys     0m0.031s
> 
> real    0m31.457s
> user    0m0.015s
> sys     0m0.000s
> 
> real    0m31.591s
> user    0m0.000s
> sys     0m0.031s
> 
> The another with the JIT version:
> 
> real    0m32.319s
> user    0m0.000s
> sys     0m0.030s
> 
> But I expect I should get the computer otherwise idle as far as possible 
> for this. I had other software running, but nothing with heavy loads.

Thanks for testing! Not as good as I had hoped, but also not (much)
worse than before...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

  • LilyPond 2.25.14 Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
    • Re: LilyPond... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Lily... Kenneth Wolcott
        • Re: ... Kenneth Wolcott
          • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
            • ... Kenneth Wolcott
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Lily... Karlin High
        • Re: ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • ... Karlin High
            • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Lily... Jean Abou Samra
        • Re: ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Lily... Michael Käppler
        • Re: ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • ... Michael Käppler via Discussions on LilyPond development
            • ... Mathieu Demange via Discussions on LilyPond development
    • Re: LilyPond... Aaron Hill
      • Re: Lily... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
        • Re: ... Aaron Hill
          • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development

Reply via email to