On 2024-03-24 1:23 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 18:18 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2024-03-23 6:25 am, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.25.14. This is
> termed a development release, but these are usually reliable for
> testing new features and recent bug fixes. However, if you require
> stability, we recommend using version 2.24.3, the current stable
> release.
> Please refer to the Installing section in the Learning Manual for
> instructions how to set up the provided binaries:
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/learning/installing
####
/opt/lilypond/2.25.14/bin/lilypond: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6:
version `GLIBC_2.28' not found (required by
/opt/lilypond/2.25.14/bin/lilypond)
####
Something changed from .13 to .14? I'm presuming my system is just
out-of-date, and this might be expected.
Yes, 2.25.14 is built in Alma Linux 8 instead of CentOS 7 which raises
the glibc requirement. I didn't mention it in the release email because
I thought it wouldn't make a practical difference as outlined in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2024-02/msg00052.html
Which distribution are you running?
The error occurred from my WSL1 environment running Ubuntu 18.04.
Probably my own fault for keeping bionic around.
I do have Ubuntu 20.04 under WSL2. I can confirm 2.25.14 runs under
focal without complaining about glibc.
Based on the email thread you linked, perhaps I should nuke all my WSL
distros at this point and start from scratch with the latest Ubuntu (22,
I gather). Not sure if Alma is an option for WSL.
-- Aaron Hill
