> On 13 Jan 2023, at 19:03, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> [...] a possible future change could be, say, >> >> \include "arabic.ly" >> \language "arabic-hel" >> >> but I don't see much benefit for that. > > Hmm, probably it *is* the way to go – this is exactly what is done in > `makam.ly` and `turkish-makam.ly`. Too bad that `makam.ly` is > essentially undocumented...
From what I can see, makam.ly is the original faulty file, only there for backwards compatibility, which might be removed if there is no need for that. The file turkish-makam.ly <http://turkish-makam.ly/> is the corrected one written by Adam Good. I described the theoretical background in the post below: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2022-12/msg00187.html
