Am Di., 27. Dez. 2022 um 17:11 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr>: > > Le 27/12/2022 à 17:06, Thomas Morley a écrit : > >>> TODO guile message about `string-delete' > >>> > >>> adding-fingerings-or-string-numbers-or-stroke-fingerings-outside-of-the-music-code.ly > >> > >> Can be fixed by just inverting the arguments to string-delete. > > Surprisingly not. > > > ?
Obviously I don't understand: > > I took the snippet code and replaced > Here string-delete has two arguments. A string and a procedure. > (string-delete s > (lambda (c) > (case c > ((#\%) > (if (not (char=? prev-char #\nul)) > (set! delete? #t))) > ((#\newline)(set! delete? #f))) > (set! prev-char c) > delete?)))) > > > with > Here string-delete has one argument, a procedure. > (string-delete > (lambda (c) > (case c > ((#\%) > (if (not (char=? prev-char #\nul)) > (set! delete? #t))) > ((#\newline)(set! delete? #f))) > (set! prev-char c) > delete?) > s))) Am I wrong? > After this, it compiles without warning in 2.24 and gives the same > output (minus small spacing differences) as 2.22.
