Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022, 14:18:
> Le 24/08/2022 à 10:28, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit : > > This has the drawback, of course, of needing c:4 instead of c4, but > > personally, I wouldn't be bothered very much by this. But of course > > it's very likeliy that this idea would create syntactical ambiguities > > that I didn't spot yet. > > > > IIUC, in this scheme, the optional modifier(s) come right after the root > with a dot, then there is a colon and the chord duration? > > If that is correct, change that c:4 to c:8 and you will already spot a > problem. > *facepalm* I never liked (nor used) the :8 tremolo shorthand. To be honest, I didn't even know that it's even possible to use it without a duration. (But I'm asking myself if the :8 should even be supported in chordmode. Anyway I'm not talking about a unified chord/note mode here.) > OTOH, you could have "c.:8", making the dot mandatory even if there is > no modifier, but I think we'll agree it looks ugly. > Yes. Lukas
