On 2022-08-22 6:12 am, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
I think it would be a considerable gain in heavy-handedness if I would
have to do

<f:maj7>1*2 <g:7> <g:m7>1 <ges:7>1 <f:maj7> <ges:7>

instead of

f1*2:maj7 g:7 g1:m7 ges1:7 f1:maj7 ges1:7

Not to sound contrarian, but I would very much welcome the former syntax.

While I have used LilyPond since 2.10.33 and am quite used to the existing chord-mode form, I am nevertheless irked by the need to sandwich the duration between the chord root and its modifiers. I have to make a strong mental effort to pronounce the chord in my head as "D, for a half note, minor seventh" in order to successfully type "d2:m7".

If we borrowed the chord syntax from note-mode, it would mean when typing "<d:m7>2" I could think "D minor seventh, for a half note" which feels much more natural.


-- Aaron Hill

Reply via email to