Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > Am Fr., 12. März 2021 um 10:45 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley > <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >> >> Am Do., 11. März 2021 um 22:47 Uhr schrieb Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide > >> > Do you already have results? >> >> Currently my regular job eats up all my time. >> Probably I'll find some free time at upcoming weekend, not sure though... >> If so, to which guile-version should I compare, guile-1.8 (which is >> still LilyPond-default) or a certain guile-2/3-version? > > Found some time today... > > I tested a huge ly-score, once sent by Jean-Charles for testing > different guile-versions: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-11/msg00948.html > Thanks again! > I made it compilable with recent ly-master out of > 55ca32d951dd17556df8d0332b861f0cd189379a > (though I didn't fix all warnings and programming errors) > > Tested with these guile versions: > guile-1.8.8 from tarball > guile-2-2-6 out of a69b567d97f7c9193924c775e1dd86e43a35b8bd > guile-3.0.6 from master, i.e. out of 85433fc2b122dc78342c3c83941949d1d9318399 > (although (version) says: 3.0.5.116-85433) > > There are some guile-warnings, multiple instances of: > WARNING: (#{ g478}#): `smallCaps-markup' imported from both (lily) and > (#{ g171}#) > WARNING: (scm framework-ps): imported module (lily) overrides core binding `_' > The latter one is about gettext and PITA. > > > I compiled Urtext.ly from the tarball linked above (giving a 158 pages pdf): > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > guile-1.8.8 > > real 4m37,304s > user 4m14,144s > sys 0m7,717s > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > guile-2.2.6, (version) says: 2.2.6.7-9a11b > > real 7m18,995s > user 6m41,808s > sys 0m11,960s > > eating much more memory than guile-1.8.8 > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > guile-3.0.6, (version) says: 3.0.5.116-85433 > > real 5m49,587s > user 5m11,033s > sys 0m9,488s > > eating a little more memory than with guile-1.8.8 but far less than > guile-2.2.6
Thank you for your test! We’re getting close to making Guile 3.x a viable default target for Lilypond again! ♡ Can I forward your email to guile-devel? > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > > Interestingly I found some older timing values from former tests: > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > released lilypond-2.19.52 with guile-1.8.7 > > real 8m16.191s > user 6m39.864s > sys 0m10.860s > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > with guile-versions from 2.0.14 and 2.1.7 I noted: > > Best result was: > real 25m17.082s > user 31m1.668s > sys 0m5.480s > > Worst result was: > real 77m44.348s > user 100m40.324s > sys 0m18.932s > > Though, my noted former results are a little messy: I can't say > anymore which guile-version with which lilypond-patches was > best/worst. > > Anyway, both, LilyPond and guile seem to have improved a lot. Wow, yes — that’s pretty cool! Did you do these tests on the same machine? Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
