On 2020/05/01 09:49:35, hanwenn wrote: > LilyPond can also output postscript with embedded fonts, which you should be > able to send to a Postscript printer (I have a PS printer too, but it's a 2001 > model, which probably is too old to deal with OTF/CFF fonts). In this scenario, > you don't need Ghostscript, so LilyPond per se doesn't depend on GS.
Sure, but web applications where AGPL is of primary concern are more likely to provide PDFs or PNGs, both of which are handled via GhostScript. https://codereview.appspot.com/548030043/
