On 2020/04/30 19:15:23, hahnjo wrote: > This probably goes without saying, but touching such core functionality should > receive very rigid testing. I hope I got most things covered, but especially > manual feedback would be very much appreciated!
Sounds pretty good. A great long-term perspective would be to use Cairo for everything (or almost everything). Last time I looked, the PDF document model was insufficient for getting all LilyPond PDF features supported, but that may have changed. LilyPond's internal graphical data structures are certainly worth replacing with something more compact. If stencils were just Cairo data... https://codereview.appspot.com/548030043/
