Lukas-Fabian Moser <l...@gmx.de> writes: > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 09:08, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> a écrit : > > Color me curious: why would you try building staging? The whole point >> of the staging system was to avoid breakage for developers. Only patchy >> processes are supposed to care about staging. >> > > Master didn't compile, and I tried staging next. But I see now that this > doesn't make much sense as staging is more likely to break. > > I don't remember what exactly kept Master from compiling yesterday - when I > tried later it worked. But anyway, my stupid procedure enabled me to > confirm that Staging broke with the same error that you encountered. > > By the way: does it make sense to compile and use the stable/2.20 branch > for my everyday work (beta testing, so to speak)?
That would certainly make sense as long as it has what you need. -- David Kastrup
