Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am Samstag, den 08.02.2020, 17:31 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > P.S. that 'make test-baseline' failed, I'll need to investigate >> > after >> > sending this. >> > >> > >> >> input/regression/display-lily-tests.ly:230:1: fatal error: Test >> unequal: BUG. >> in = \applyOutput Foo #(lambda (arg) (list)) >> out = \applyOutput Foo ##f >> >> >> \test ##[ \applyOutput Foo #(lambda (arg) (list)) #] >> >> >> Not much of a surprise here: Guile-2 does not keep the source of >> functions around in general. And Urs > > ? (is there another one around here?)
Dan. Knowing my luck, now both will be offended. Sorry. >> turned warnings in that file into >> errors so that they would not get overlooked. Which certainly is >> sensible, but it means we need to think about what to do here. -- David Kastrup My replies have a tendency to cause friction. To help mitigating damage, feel free to forward problematic posts to me adding a subject like "timeout 1d" (for a suggested timeout of 1 day) or "offensive".