Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: > On Jan 21, 2020, at 14:20, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> Notation borrowed directly from them will not integrate well >>> into LilyPond, but it might be fruitful to ask how we could modify >>> expressions like these to fit in. > ... >> The syntax appears not to be a good match to LilyPond even though the >> concept may be considered fitting. > > I'm glad you agree.
StaffGroup = "organ" . Staff = "upper" . Voice . SubVoice = 2 #'((StaffGroup . organ) (Staff . upper) Voice (SubVoice . 2)) Does this give us a hook into making \set, \override and/or \tempo a music function in the long run? Less than sure about that. Particularly \tempo appears rather tricky. -- David Kastrup
