Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>> Han-Wen has recently pushed a bunch of changes directly to >>> Rietveld, most of them quite uncontroversial. I assume that this >>> is as good as an e-mail :-) >>> >>> I thus suggest that after his patches have been reviewed, >> >> How are they going to get reviewed when there is nothing pointing to >> them? How would anyone including Han-Wen know when the review phase >> ends? > > Well, as has been pointed out, pull requests at github don't have > 'review phases', and what we have here is comparable IMHO. > > One developer (or maybe two, just to be sure) acknowledges the patch, > and that's it. Kind of a highway solution for trivial things.
Trivial things from a developer with push access can be just pushed. Complex or otherwise contential things warrant a chance for developers to take a look at it. "Half a chance" seems an unnecessary complication. -- David Kastrup