Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> Send an email (must be less than 64 KB) to >> <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> briefly explaining your work, with the >> patch files attached. Translators should send patches to >> <translati...@lilynet.net>. After your patches are reviewed, the >> developers may push one or more of them to the main repository or >> discuss them with you. > > Han-Wen has recently pushed a bunch of changes directly to Rietveld, > most of them quite uncontroversial. I assume that this is as good as > an e-mail :-) > > I thus suggest that after his patches have been reviewed,
How are they going to get reviewed when there is nothing pointing to them? How would anyone including Han-Wen know when the review phase ends? > he should simply commit to `staging`. If a developer has doubts, we > can create an SourceForge issue to do it the normal way. > > Of course, this is a temporary measure until Janek finds and >implements something better (see the Salzburg googledoc file posted >recently for more). -- David Kastrup
